We have a fairly manageable basket of issues: UIBC chief
More than two months after Prime Minister Narendra Modi and U.S. President Donald Trump announced in Osaka that U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer and Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal should meet and resolve the trade impasse, there has been no meeting thus far, but U.S.-India Business Council (UIBC) presidentNisha Biswal says she is hopeful they will meet before Mr. Modi travels to the U.S. this month. Excerpts:
Why have the trade representatives not been able to meet despite the leaders’ decisions during two separate meetings in the last three months?
I think it is a really busy time for the United States on the trade front. We are also in the midst of an intense set of back-and-forths with China; you have the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement before the Congress.
What has prevented the trade representatives (TRs) from getting together is a matter of aligning schedules.
My understanding is both leaders have expressed a strong commitment to have the TRs to meet before PM Modi’s visit to the U.S. (September 21-28); I am hopeful that will still happen.
Once they meet, what are the concessions both sides must give in order to break the ice?
I think the ‘landing zones’ will be the things that American industry has identified, including concerns on tariffs on ICT, price controls on medical devices, things that the USTR has identified like market access to agricultural products, as well as issues the Indian side has highlighted, including the Section 232 tariffs (tariffs on steel and aluminum), the withdrawal of India’s GSP status, etc. I don’t think that it is that difficult to find an agreement that meets the core concerns and moves us beyond these issues. Compared to trade negotiations the world over, we have a fairly manageable basket of issues. What is important is to establish that we can negotiate them.
How much is the danger of the USTR launching a ‘301 investigation’ against India?
One should always be watchful of that, but when you have two leaders with an express commitment to improve the economic partnership, there is a way forward; and I am fairly confident if the two trade teams get together, they will come up with a solution.
Have other issues like regulations on e-commerce been resolved?
I wouldn’t say that U.S. businesses are comfortable with them, but they are somewhat reassured that there is now a more inclusive and consultative process to address these specific issues.
The biggest issue is that for India to attract the kind of investment it needs, it has to project policy stability and policy coherence. Everyone recognises that as India grows, its policy framework needs to evolve, but it should be done in a way that is stable and coherent. On e-commerce and data protection, India has indicated it will take its time.
How should India position itself to benefit from the U.S.-China trade fallout?
Moving supply chains is a very capital-intensive proposition, and India has yet to create incentives and efficiencies that would allow firms to make that switch. If companies don’t see a predictability and reliability in the tax structure, how will they incur such large liabilities and how will they plan to recoup their investment?
Many countries are providing tax deferments for time, land incentives, ensuring infrastructure and a skilled labour pool.
It isn’t just India, but the U.S. too has shown lack of policy stability and coherence; whether it is on sudden tariffs, sanctions on oil, changes in immigration laws…
At the USIBC, we have been consistently voicing our opposition to tariffs.
Everyone loses in a trade war. The frustration that has to be dealt with though is that if the U.S. is adhering to a low tariff and high standards regime, then there must be a similar movement by our trading partners, else resentment builds up in the U.S. that it is not a level-playing field for our companies globally. And, that’s why there is decreasing support for free trade agreements (FTAs) domestically.
Is a U.S.-India FTA likely?
I think to say it is likely overstating the case, but it is imperative for both countries to move in that direction for U.S.-India trade to get to where we want it.
Report for FY20 to be given by Oct. 31
To achieve $5 trillion in GDP by FY25, India needs to spend $1.4 trillion on infrastructure. Arunangsu Roy Chowdhury
The government on Saturday said it had constituted a high-level task force to identify infrastructure projects for ₹100 lakh-crore worth investment to be made by 2024-25 as India aims to become a $5-trillion economy.
The task force, headed by the Economic Affairs Secretary, will draw up a ‘national infrastructure pipeline’ of ₹100 lakh-crore, the Finance Ministry said in a statement.
This would include greenfield and brownfield projects costing above ₹100 crore each.
The task force will comprise secretaries from different Ministries, senior officials and the NITI Aayog CEO. It will identify technically feasible and financially/economically viable infrastructure projects that can be initiated in 2019-20.
List of projects
Further, it has been asked to list the projects that can be included in the pipeline for each of the remaining five years between FY21 and FY25.
The task force, constituted by Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, will submit its report on the pipeline for 2019-20 by October 31, 2019 and on the indicative pipeline for 2021-25 by December-end, the Ministry said.
To achieve the target of scaling India’s GDP to $5 trillion by 2024-25, the country needs to spend about $1.4 trillion (₹100 lakh crore) from the fiscal 2019-20 to 2024-25 on infrastructure, it added.
In the past decade (fiscal 2008-17), India invested about $1.1 trillion in infrastructure.
The challenge is to step up annual infrastructure investment so that lack of infrastructure does not become a binding constraint on the growth of the Indian economy, the Ministry said.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi, in his Independence Day speech, had said that ₹100 lakh crore would be invested in infrastructure over the next five years.
These will include social and economic infrastructure projects.
However, public sector lenders may wait for initial share offerings to get better valuation
Rider for merger: Banks must get IRDAI’s nod to hold over 15% stake in two insurers till the IPO. Gettyimages/istock
After the merger of 10 public sector banks (PSBs) into four, two of them will hold over 15% stake in two different insurance companies, individually.
According to insurance regulations, a bank cannot hold more than 15% stake in more than one insurance company.
“Having more than 15% stake in an insurance company gives the status of the promoter to the entity. One entity cannot be a promoter of two insurance companies,” a senior insurance industry official said. “So, the banks have to completely exit one insurance company or cut stake to 15%,” the official added. Two sets of merger-bound PSBs will hold stakes in two different insurance companies, post the merger. One is Punjab National-Oriental Bank of Commerce-United Bank of India combine and another is the Union Bank-Andhra Bank-Corporation Bank combine.
In the first combine both PNB and OBC hold stakes in two different insurers. PNB has a 30% stake in PNB Metlife Life India Insurance Company while OBC holds 23% in Canara-HSBC-OBC Life Insurance. So, the merged entity — PNB — will hold over 15% stakes in both the companies.
In the second combine, Union Bank holds 25% stake in Star Union Dai-Ichi Life Insurance Company while Andhra Bank holds 30% stake in India-First Life Insurance Company. So, the merged entity — Union Bank — will have more than 15% in both the life insurers.
However, bank officials said they were not in a hurry to cut stake as that could impact valuations. Banks would wait for an initial public offering (IPO) to offload stakes.
“We are not in a hurry to sell stake. After the merger, when there is an IPO of one of the companies, we will reduce stake,” said a top official from one of the merger-bound banks.
Banks will have to get the permission of the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI) — the insurance regulator — for holding over 15% stake in two insurers for a while, that is, till the IPO. Bank mergers are expected to be completed by March 2020 and it is unlikely insurers would like to hit the capital markets, especially when the markets are choppy.
Interestingly, PNB Metlife was planning an IPO last year but postponed its plans due to market conditions.
OBC had also been planning to divest stake in Canara-HSBC-OBC Life Insurance last year but the plan was shelved.
IDBI Bank, in which LIC has a majority stake, also has an insurance arm in IDBI-Federal Life Insurance in which it holds 48% stake.
The bank has now started the process of exiting the life insurance company.
Technologies will connect ‘right job to right person’, shows Dell-IFTF study
By the year 2030, CVs (curriculum vitae) will be passe, as there will be numerous apps and tools capable of match-making for jobs.
Recent advances in deep-tech learning are making it possible for powerful algorithms to identify skills and capabilities that are not explicitly described on a resume. That means technologies that are emerging today already make it possible to more aptly match the right work to the right person regardless of their gender, age or geographic location.
A recent study by Dell Technologies, in partnership with the California-based, Institute for the Future (IFTF), explored how collaborative artificial intelligence, multi-modal interfaces, extended reality, and secure distributed ledgers would intersect with evolving social and economic forces to shape how we prepare for, find jobs and work in 2030. New software systems can help create a richer picture of an applicant by extrapolating relevant skills related to their hobbies and experience, and through applying contextual information about how other workers from the same educational institution or learning pathway have fared in the position, the study said.
Advancements in technology will require new skills and capabilities for workers to excel in the 2030 work environment. The changes to work and learning in the next 10 years would be enabled by the maturation and proliferation of today’s emerging technologies, which would give birth to new industries, jobs, skills, places of work and working patterns, the study said.